Backdoor.IRCBot.ACD,

[lordpake]

fletch, you have been around here long enough that you should by now know no single solution can catch 100% of pests out there

This applies to AV's, anti-malware etc. too.

[lordpake]

SAS is the best AntiSpyware tool on this planet

Berny +++

That may be so. However, that doesn't make SAS a solution that catches everything.

No offence intended to devs This is just a reality with signature-based protection.

[Lasse88]

SAS uses generic detection, and the same do other leading companies such as spysweeper and kaspersky.

[SUPERAntiSpy]

SAS is the best AntiSpyware tool on this planet

Berny +++

That may be so. However, that doesn't make SAS a solution that catches everything.

No offence intended to devs This is just a reality with signature-based protection.

SUPERAntiSpyware is not just signature based protection. Signatures are part of the system, but certainly not the whole protection/detection system.

[redwolfe_98]

"spyware doctor" could be flagging some "IRC" program that is not really malware, which could explain why SAS is not flagging it..

[Lasse88]

lordpake

I run SAS/Malwarebytes/and DrWeb {on demand}

Hi friends,

When installing two anti-virus shields it is well known

you will be facing serious conflicts on your system.

I assume that this rule is the same when speaking about

an anti-spyware shield ?

Berny +++

it doesnt matter how many Antispyware programs you have, you can have 100 without any problems, as long you only have 1 running with real-time-protection..

and bstandaert wrote "on demand" which means he use them to scan his computer.

[juney.inin]

Yes their could not be a single solution that can catch 100 percent of those pests out there... even if in anti virus or anti malware or something..

_________________

Contact Center